the future of journalism

I contributed an essay on the future of journalism to the Spring issue of Journalism which is dedicated to celebrating the journal’s tenth anniversary. Of course everyone is weighing in on the topic these days, including this yesterday from Clay Shirky and this from Michael Hirschorn. Hirschorn writes about the death of news print, and the New York Times specifically:

But over the long run, a world in which journalism is no longer weighed down by the need to fold an omnibus news product into a larger lifestyle-tastic package might turn out to be one in which actual reportage could make the case for why it matters, and why it might even be worth paying for. The best journalists will survive and eventually thrive

It’s good to see people looking at last beyond the tragic death of the old model. Here are my two cents.


News Bust; News Boom (draft)

News and journalism are in a boom period of innovation and expansion.

If that comes as a surprise, it is because the mainstream news media for years has been reporting gloomily on its own demise. But that gloomy story is a narrow business story, where the mainstream news industry is conflated with the much wider news, information and communication culture. Yes, business models are in flux, jobs are vanishing and the news industry as we have known it is in late-stage critical condition. But as anyone with an internet connection knows, news is thriving. Profits may be down but information is up. The amount of news material produced each day, access to that material, varieties in form and content, participation in the making and disseminating of it — it’s all booming.

In the last year, I have assembled a homepage that delivers eclectic journalism from various mainstream and independent sources to my desktop in realtime. I read mainstream and independent blogs of opinion and analysis. I read local and national reporting from the United States but also local and national and international reporting from around the world. My personalized RSS feeds and email lists point me to additional news sources that I only wish I had time to follow. As a consumer of news I, like many people I know, have never been more satisfied with the options, never more engaged in the material being reported and the process through which it is being reported, and I have never been more interested in the question of how all of that might change tomorrow and the next day.

We presently enjoy a mix of big-budget, shoestring-budget and free reporting. The fear is that big-budget reporting will disappear.  But the market for consistently delivered well edited beat reporting remains. People still read the New York Times; they’re just not willing to pay for it the way they used to do. Fact is, in 2008 spending on internet advertising will, for the first time, surpass combined spending on television, radio and film advertising (Richard & King 2008) and, despite the financial crisis, analysts forecast double digit percentage increases in online advertising over the next five years (IAB 2008, Glaser 2007, Ramsey 2008). That revenue will support a well-branded leaner class of what we might call traditional journalists. The members of that new leaner class, in turn, will adjust to becoming merely one set of contributors to the collection of news material aggregated by users and filtering software to make a new kind of “paper of record.” The evolution of journalism will partly depend on how traditional journalists learn how best to add value to the new news environment. It is not merely a matter of adopting new technologies. There must also be a willingness to shift mentalities, to adapt the traditional values and practices of journalism so that they match the best part of the wider contemporary news culture.

There is a long list of developments taking place that point to an increase in the ability of journalism to serve the public interest. At the top of that list is expanded public participation in the field. The remarkable increase in access to news information over the past decade has been matched by the equally remarkable increase in the number of people producing journalistic material. In 1987, James Carey wrote that “the public will reawaken when [it is] … encouraged to join the talk rather than to sit passively before a discussion conducted by journalists and experts.” Cast in the light that sees journalism as fundamental to and an accelerator of democracy, the practice — if not necessarily the profession — of journalism might be seen as heading in the best possible direction.

Greater public participation, for example, is generating more useable so-called hyperlocal news, which is reported increasingly via crowdsourcing  and instant messaging by local residents intimately familiar with what they are reporting. U.C. Berkeley journalism student sites report on Bay Area neighborhood issues.  A St Louis broadcaster set up social networking sites so residents falling behind on their housing payments could share vital information. The trend is realtime, participatory, engaging and growing.

Similarly, concerns with fact-checking and fairness that drew warnings surrounded by exclamation points even a year ago are beginning to be answered by the expanded digital network. Less tied to corporations, labor unions and political parties, independent fact-check sites, like, will be a welcome substitute to editorial boards. Likewise, the growing number of internet users now practiced at factchecking is vastly surpassing the capabilities of most stripped-down newsroom staffs. At the best news sites, the commitment to accuracy on the part of the staff is matched by the commitment of the readers. Errors are called out and stories are updated all the time.

The rapidly increasing percentage of material online designed to be shared — so-called spreadable or viral media — encourages users to adapt it to their own purposes, to use it to inform on multiple issues of concern. Crowd-funding, where readers finance specific investigative reporting, distributes the power to set the news agenda.   Second-generation social news sites such as NewsTrust and NewsCred aggregate and rate stories based on quality not just popularity. Google is developing search tools that will rank stories based on factors such as number and reliability of source links and the author’s record of publication.

The future of journalism is here. It is characterized by increasingly distributed profits and distributed reporting. It is more opinionated and more fair, more varied in form and content, more local and more national, more global and more personal. It is more horizontal and collaborative and open ended. The future of journalism, like news, is being forged by the boom in innovation and expansion we are living through today.


Carey, James (1987). “The Press and Public Discourse.” The Center Magazine, March/April, 4-16.

Glaser, Mark (2007). ‘Your Guide to Online Advertising’, Media Shift, viewed 15 Nov 2008 <;

IAB (2008). ‘Internet Advertising Revenue Report conducted by ‘PricewaterhouseCooper’, viewed 15 Nov 2008, <;

Richard, Chuck and Sheila King (2008). ‘Annual Advertising and Marketing Study 2008’, Outsell Inc., viewed 15 Nov 2008 <;

Ramsey, Geoff (2008) ‘Online Ad spending will keep growing’, Emarketing, viewed 15 Nov 2008 <;

This entry was posted in Journalism and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to the future of journalism

  1. Google is developing search tools that will rank stories based on factors such as number and reliability of source links and the author’s record of publication.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s